Defects under NEC4 Contracts – summary of key terminology and mechanisms
Allen Owen takes readers through the key areas of interest in NEC4 contracts.
- Details
The concept of Defects under NEC contracts is central to the management of risks and liabilities related to the quality of works and services provided.
The ethos of Defects in NEC contracts is rooted in the principles of mutual trust, flexibility, and clarity. In this article, we outline the key principles and mechanisms relating to Defects in NEC4 contracts.
TERMINOLOGY SUMMARY
There are a variety of often confused defined terms relating to Defects under NEC contracts, we summarise these below based on the specifics of the NEC4 Engineering and Construction Contract.
Note that there are nuances in the defined terms/mechanisms used for Defects across the NEC suite, please refer to the specific forms for details.
Term | Explanation |
Defect |
|
*defects date | The defects date is a date set by reference to a period following Completion of the whole of the works (often between 12 and 24 months). After the defects date, the Contractor:
|
*defect correction period(s) | Specifies the time limit for correcting a particular Defect; different Defect Correction Periods may be stated for different categories of Defects (e.g. Defects that pose a risk to health and safety may have a shorter Defect Correction Period).
The Contractor is required to rectify a Defect within the stated defect correction period. The defect correction period starts:
Notwithstanding this, it is important to note that for Completion to be certified by the Project Manager, the Contractor must have already corrected any Defects that would have prevented the Client from using the works or Others from doing their work. |
Defects Certificate | The document issued by the Supervisor at the defects date if all notified Defects have been corrected on this date.
Otherwise, the Defects Certificate is issued at the earlier of:
|
*The relevant dates and periods for these terms are stated by the Client within Contract Data Part 1.
GENERAL DEFECT PRINCIPLES ACROSS NEC4 CONTRACTS
Early Warning
- Contractors and Project Managers must give early warnings as soon as they are aware of any matter which could:
- Increase the cost; or
- Delay completion.
- This could include a requirement to provide early warnings in respect of Defects.
Identification of Defects
- Identification of Defects can occur through numerous means under NEC contracts, including via testing, inspections, specific searching for Defects, or generally during the course of the works and services.
- The Contractor and the Supervisor are each required to notify the other of identified Defects prior to the defects date.
- NEC contracts make a point of encouraging a proactive approach to identifying, and then managing, Defects.
Correction and re-inspection
- As outlined in the table above, the defect correction period identifies the length of time within which Defects must be rectified.
- It is often misconstrued that the defects date sets the date by which Defects must be corrected, however, the defects date is the deadline by which all Defects must be notified.
- If a test or inspection identifies a Defect, the Contractor then corrects the Defect, and the test or inspection is then repeated.
- Re-inspection of Defects ensures compliance with duties to rectify Defects.
Payment for correction of Defects
- Under NEC4 contracts using Main Payment Option C (Target contract with activity schedule) and Option E (cost reimbursable contract), the cost of correcting Defects prior to Completion is paid by the Client. The exception to this is when the Defect is caused by the Contractor’s failure to comply with a constraint in the Scope regarding how the service is to be provided.
- After Completion, the cost of correcting Defects constitutes Disallowed Cost and is not payable by the Client.
- Although this is often an unpopular position with clients, this aims to incentivise the Contractor to actively search for and identify Defects prior to Completion.
- Under Main Payment Option A (Priced contract with activity schedule), the cost of rectifying Defects is the Contractor’s risk unless a compensation event applies to the applicable Defect.
Acceptance of Defects
- There may be circumstances in which notwithstanding the identification of a Defect, the Contractor and/or the Project Manager do not consider it necessary to correct the Defect. For instance, this may be where a piece of work is not in strict compliance with the Scope but would not impact the Client’s use of the works.
- The Contractor or the Project Manager can propose to accept Defects, which involves changing the Scope, so that the Defect no longer needs to be corrected.
- A quotation is submitted by the Contractor for the Defect being accepted, which includes an earlier Completion Date or a reduction in the Prices (or both).
- If a Defect is accepted, then it is no longer treated as a Defect and the relevant party is no longer liable for it.
Remedies for uncorrected Defects
- Remedies under NEC4 for uncorrected Defects are viewed as consistent with the common law approach.
- The Contractor is liable where a Defect is not corrected within the applicable defect correction period.
- If a Contractor has had an opportunity to correct a Defect, via access during the defect correction period, the Contractor’s liability is the cost (as assessed by the Project Manager) of the Client having the Defect rectified by a third party.
- If the Contractor was not given access, then their liability is be limited to the cost (again, as assessed by the Project Manager) of the Contractor rectifying the Defect itself.
- These provisions therefore aim to balance incentivising (i) the Contractor to correct notified Defects within the required period, and (ii) the Client / Project Manager to provide access for the Contractor to rectify such Defects.
PSC4 AND TSC4 DEFECTS PROVISIONS
Below is a summary of the key nuances in respect of Defects under two other commonly used NEC4 forms (Term Service Contract and Professional Services Contract).
NEC4 Term Service Contract (“TSC”)
Defect definition
- As per the NEC4 ECC definition above, with Defects also including any part of the service which is not in accordance with the Accepted Plan (being the Contractor’s plan for providing the service, as accepted by the Service Manager.
Notification requirements
- Defects must be notified by either the Contractor or the Service Manager until the end of the Service Period.
Correction period
- The Contractor must correct a notified Defect within a time which minimises the adverse effect on the Client or Others.
NEC4 Professional Service Contract (“PSC”)
Liability
- Whilst the Defect definition in the PSC aligns with the ECC definition above, under the PSC the Consultant is only liable for Defects which arises out of the Consultant failing to carry out services with the skill and care normally used by professionals providing services similar to the service in the contract.
Allan Owen is a Partner at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This video is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
Changing Course: Navigating Variations Under JCT and NEC Contracts
May 21, 2025
Tiah Weekes explains the process of changes to contracts in the field of construction.
Lessons in public consultation: High Court finds failures in local authority’s consideration of consultation responses
May 21, 2025
George McLellan and Samuel Hart explore the High Court decision ruling that Lambeth Council broke the law in the process of establishing an LTN in the borough.
Allocating risk in amended JCT contracts: Lessons from John Sisk & Son Limited v Capital & Centric (Rose) Limited
May 12, 2025
David Owens and Elizabeth Withers explore recent developments in construction contract case law.
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |