Immediate changes to UK procurement regulations arising from International Trade Agreements
Procurement Policy Note 05/23 sets out the changes to public procurement obligations which arise out of the UK’s new Free Trade Agreements (the ‘FTAs’) with Australia and New Zealand. Juli Lau and Shyann Sheehy look at its contents.
- Details
PPN 05/23 applies to all procurements commenced after the 25th of May not just those involving Australian and New Zealand suppliers. The Public Procurement (International Trade Agreements) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 (the ‘Regulations’) amend the UK’s public procurement regulations to implement new obligations contained in the FTAs. The Regulations do not apply to devolved Welsh authorities, instead Welsh Ministers will make their own statutory instruments to implement the FTAs as they apply to their authorities.
The Regulations makes amendments to the Public Contract Regulations 2015 (the ‘PCR 2015’), the Concession Contracts Regulations 2016 and the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 (the ‘UCR 2016’) (together, the ‘Procurement Regulations’). This article will look at the changes made to the PCR 2015 and UCR 2016 specifically.
The Regulations came into force on the 25th of May, but they do not apply to procurements which had already commenced by this date. A procurement is deemed to have commenced in accordance with the applicable Procurement Regulations before the amendments came into force if the following applied:
1. a notice has been submitted to the UK e-notification service in order to—
A. invite offers or requests to be selected to tender for or to negotiate in respect of a proposed contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system; or
B. publicise an intention to hold a design contest;
2. the contracting authority or utility has had published any form of advertisement seeking offers or expressions of interest in a proposed contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system; or
3. the contracting authority or utility has contacted any economic operator in order to—
A. seek expressions of interest or offers in respect of a proposed contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system; or
B. respond to an unsolicited expression of interest or offer received from that economic operator in relation to a proposed contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system. (Section 5: Transitional Provisions, Amendment Regulations)
A procurement covers the whole of the procedure which stems from that commencement. Modification of a contract or framework agreement is not regarded as stemming from the commencement of the procurement from which the award of that contract/framework agreement itself has stemmed.
What has changed?
1) Contract value
One key change to the PCR 2015 and UCR 2016 relates to the valuation of contracts. The Regulations create special provisions for circumstances where the value of one or more lots in which proposed work, acquisition of suppliers, provision of services which has been divided cannot be estimated. In these situations, the aggregate value of the lots awarded are not allowed to exceed 20% of the aggregate value of all the lots that can be estimated. It also provides that where the contract is unable to be valued then it will be deemed to be valued at the relevant threshold for compliance.
2) Contract termination
Additionally, the Regulations also provide that contracts must not be terminated in a way which would circumvent the procurement rules or obligations in the FTAs. When aiming to terminate a contract authorities must ensure they are compliant with the relevant procurement rules.
3) Removal of PIN as call for competition
Lastly, these Regulations removal of the option of using a prior information notice or periodic indicative notice (‘PIN’) as the call for competition, for any procurement that commenced or commences after 25 May 2023. Planned procurements can continue to be made known through the publication of a PIN.
Key takeaways
Authorities must ensure they understand their obligations under the Regulations and free-trade agreements. It would be best practice for these authorities to have effective record keeping processes in place to help ensure that all estimates provided in relation to the value of contracts are as accurate as possible. Where necessary a review of current termination practices will need to be undertaken to ensure they accurately reflect these amendments and do not circumvent the procurement rules. Authorities who have historically used PINs to call for competition should also ensure they update their procurement plans in light of the removal of this route, and to reflect the use of contract notices under the PCR and UCR to call for competition.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES The CAT’s approach to Subsidy Decision Reviews: Fast, cheap and simple?
Jul 16, 2025
Olivia Dawson and Oliver Slater consider the Subsidy Control Act’s subsidy challenge regime, the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s (the “CAT’s”) approach to case management and costs, and what the future for challenges to subsidy decisions might look like.
Millbrook Healthcare Limited v Devon County Council – Its impact on local government procurement
Jul 16, 2025
Oliver Dickie, Christopher Watkins and George McLellan dive into the recent High Court judgment on interim relief in procurement claims.
Airport Subsidy Challenged in the CAT
Jul 09, 2025
Oliver Slater, Beatrice Wood and Steve Gummer dive into the latest Competition Appeal Tribunal subsidy control challenge, brought against the Welsh Government's subsidy to Cardiff Airport.
IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
|
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |