The updated Standard Selection Questionnaire
On 9 March 2023, the Cabinet Office and the Crown Commercial Service jointly published PPN 03/23 (“PPN”) which updates the standard Selection Questionnaire for public procurements and its accompanying statutory guidance. Juli Lau, Gonzalo Puertas and Shyann Sheehy examine its contents.
- Details
At a glance
The PPN applies from 1 April 2023 to all contracting authorities (“CAs”) in England, and CAs in Wales and Northern Ireland which exercise wholly or mainly reserved functions, when they undertake above threshold procurements within Part 2 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. The PPN clarifies and introduces questions in Part 3 of the Selection Questionnaire whilst allowing CAs to rephrase questions based on their e-procurement systems style or format. PPN 03/23 supersedes PPN 08/16 and replaces the European Single Procurement Document with the Selection Questionnaire template at Annex C of PPN 03/23.
The specifics
The PPN provides clarity to CAs on what is deemed as acceptable responses by bidders. For example, clarity is provided in the definitions of ‘relying on another organisation’ to meet the selection criteria to when a bidder relies on an organisation’s technical and professional ability and/or economic and financial standing. Moreover, the changes mean that bidders acting on behalf of a group/consortium or using subcontractors may need to complete Part 3 of the Selection Questionnaire differently than Parts 1 or 2 and show how a subcontractor has provided similar requirements previously.
There have also been amendments to the financial questions and checks in Part 3 although CAs can choose to only include appropriate and proportionate questions. In all cases, CAs should state any minimum Economic and Financial Standing (“EFS”) requirements, selection criteria and methodology assessment. For instance, stating that the CA will require evidence to be provided under regulation 60(8) PCR 2015 to assess whether the bidder meets the minimum EFS requirements.
The PPN also refers to a number of other related PPNs which are to be considered in the procurement selection process and introduces several questions accordingly. Namely, CAs should develop an appropriate selection criterion in relation to bidders’ technical and professional ability. This includes bidders’ ability to implement appropriate measures to protect the right of data subjects, comply with GDPR, meet environmental law obligations and manage health and safety in their supply chains. As noted in our blog, CAs should also use the modern slavery risk assessment table provided to demonstrate how any risks will be identified and managed and, where there is a high risk of modern slavery occurring, bidders are required to submit self-declarations for each supply chain member. Also, with central government contracts valued above £5 million per annum, CAs may require confirmation that the bidder is committed to achieving Net Zero by 2050, supported by an effective Carbon Reduction Plan, and has reliable, effective payment systems in their organisation.
Key takeaway
CAs must ensure that they use the new standard questions from 1st April 2023, and should familiarise themselves with the PPN and its accompanying statutory guidance, and check that their e-procurement platforms address the updates and provide sufficient explanation to bidders regarding the new selection questions. Also, CAs must be aware of their obligation to report deviations from the standard questions.
We advise contracting authorities on all manner of issues relating to public procurement and our experts are on hand to guide authorities through the intricacies of running a procurement and responding to procurement challenges.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
Changing Course: Navigating Variations Under JCT and NEC Contracts
May 21, 2025
Tiah Weekes explains the process of changes to contracts in the field of construction.
Lessons in public consultation: High Court finds failures in local authority’s consideration of consultation responses
May 21, 2025
George McLellan and Samuel Hart explore the High Court decision ruling that Lambeth Council broke the law in the process of establishing an LTN in the borough.
Allocating risk in amended JCT contracts: Lessons from John Sisk & Son Limited v Capital & Centric (Rose) Limited
May 12, 2025
David Owens and Elizabeth Withers explore recent developments in construction contract case law.
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |