Must read

Families refusing access to support
Adequacy Decision Granted to the UK
Charlotte Smith considers two recent adequacy decisions and explains how this affects existing data practices.
- Details
After six months of waiting, it was confirmed on 28 June 2021 that the European Union has granted the UK an adequacy decision for data protection. In fact, there have been two adequacy decisions – one under the GDPR, and another in relation to processing under the Law Enforcement Directive.
What does this mean?
Under the EU GDPR, personal data cannot be transferred to a country outside of the European Economic Area without an appropriate safeguard being put in place (e.g. standard contractual clauses and binding corporate rules under the GDPR), unless that personal data was being transferred to a country with an adequacy decision.
When the UK left the EU and the Brexit deal was finalised an adequacy decision had not yet been determined. Instead a six month bridging period was agreed which allowed personal data to continue to flow freely whilst the EU determined if an adequacy decision would be granted. That adequacy decision
is now in place.
This means that personal data can still flow from the EU to the UK without the need for appropriate safeguards or relying on an exception under Article 49 of the EU GDPR. As the UK also does not require appropriate safeguards for transfers of personal data to the EU then this adequacy decision means that personal data can more easily flow between the UK and EU. This is a decision that will be welcomed by organisations operating in both the UK and EU who were likely becoming concerned that they may need to quickly put standard contractual clauses in place and amend their data practices, if they had not already done so.
What do the adequacy decisions say?
It is time limited. Unlike adequacy decisions granted by the EU to other countries, the adequacy decisions granted to the UK are for 4 years and are not indefinite. The EU acknowledges that, for now, the UK’s data protection legislation is very closely aligned to the EU; post-Brexit the UK brought the GDPR into UK and the EU’s Law Enforcement Directive is incorporated into UK
law through the Data Protection Act 2018.
After those four years the adequacy decision can be renewed if the EU considers that the UK continues to provide an adequate standard of protection for the personal data of individuals in the EU.
It will be interesting to see if the time limited nature of the adequacy decision will impact on any updates to data protection legislation that the Government may be considering. The recent report by the Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform suggested replacing the GDPR in the UK and we wait to see if the Government decides to adopt those recommendations. The EU Commission is likely to be following those developments carefully when considering whether to extend the adequacy decision in the future.
Organisations relying on these adequacy decisions for long term transfers of personal data should bear this in mind. It may be worth considering if contracts should include explicit provisions for the data protection provisions to be revisited in future to address the transfer of personal data from the EU.
The GDPR adequacy decision also does not cover transfers of personal data for the purposes of UK immigration control. This is because of the Court of Appeal’s recent judgement in R (Open Rights Group and the3million) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 800.
The Court of Appeal held that the immigration exemption set out in Schedule 2 of the Data Protection Act 2018 was not compliant with the GDPR. The EU Commission has indicated that it will reassess whether this immigration exclusion is needed once the UK has addressed the findings of the Court of Appeal.
Charlotte Smith is an Associate at Sharpe Pritchard LLP.
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
Changing Course: Navigating Variations Under JCT and NEC Contracts
May 21, 2025
Tiah Weekes explains the process of changes to contracts in the field of construction.
Lessons in public consultation: High Court finds failures in local authority’s consideration of consultation responses
May 21, 2025
George McLellan and Samuel Hart explore the High Court decision ruling that Lambeth Council broke the law in the process of establishing an LTN in the borough.
Allocating risk in amended JCT contracts: Lessons from John Sisk & Son Limited v Capital & Centric (Rose) Limited
May 12, 2025
David Owens and Elizabeth Withers explore recent developments in construction contract case law.
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |