Sparks Flying: Increasing Network Connectivity For Tenants
Lillee Reid-Hunt, James Nelson and Natasha Barlow look at the potential impact of The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 on reducing delays in the installation of telecommunications equipment to leasehold properties.
- Details
The Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 (the Act) received royal assent on 15 March 2021. The Act amends the Electronic Communications Code 2017 (the Code) by introducing a new Part 4A into the Communications Act 2003 and seeks to alleviate the frustration of operators who cannot install telecommunication infrastructure at leasehold properties due to unresponsive landlords. The issue of fast and reliable connectivity at home has become all the more pertinent in the last year and this Act seeks to redress a key area that delays tenants’ access to better networks.
The Act targets residential properties that are under multiple occupation, primarily blocks of flats. It does not apply to commercial premises. Tenants have existing rights under the Code to request that operators provide electronic communications services to their property (in fact, it is occupiers of land only that can grant Code rights). The operator in turn must give the landlord notice seeking agreement to exercise Code rights.
The Act now requires operators to issue a further two warning notices and a final notice on the landlord at specified intervals. If the landlord repeatedly fails to respond to these notices, the operator can apply to the Upper Tribunal for an interim order (a Part 4A Order). This process could be completed in as little as six weeks, which should reduce the time and cost to operators of pursuing uncommunicative landlords. This feeds into the government’s goal of increasing the speed and range of connectivity across the country.
The court will grant a Part 4A Order if it is satisfied that the notices specified above have been issued in accordance with the Act and that the landlord has not responded to the notices. A Part 4A Order will impose an interim agreement on the parties for a maximum term of 18 months, during which it is expected that the operator and the landlord can either agree a final Code agreement or the operator will apply to the Upper Tribunal for final Code rights under the existing Code process. The provisions of any interim Code agreement ordered as part of the Part 4A Order will be specified by regulations to be issued by the Secretary of State following consultation with operators and landlords and prior to the Act coming into force.
The court also has discretion to award compensation to the landlord for any loss or damage sustained in the exercise of the Part 4A Code right. However, the Act does not re-introduce any aspect of the payments under previous legislation that allowed landowners to take a cut of the income generated by operators i.e. the ‘no-network’ valuation methodology prescribed under the Code applies to any interim agreement ordered under Part 4A.
Landlords should note that they can stop the process for a Part 4A Order by responding to any of the operator’s notices within the specified period because this precludes the operator from applying for an order. The Act emphasises the importance of landlords engaging promptly with both tenants and operators in connection with any request for electronic communications services in order to avoid a Part 4A Order being imposed on them that could potentially result in less favourable terms than could be otherwise negotiated between them.
Lillee Reid-Hunt is a Senior Associate (New Zealand Qualified), James Nelson a Solicitor and Natasha Barlow a Trainee Solicitor at Sharpe Pritchard LLP
For further insight and resources on local government legal issues from Sharpe Pritchard, please visit the SharpeEdge page by clicking on the banner below.
This article is for general awareness only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The law may have changed since this page was first published. If you would like further advice and assistance in relation to any issue raised in this article, please contact us by telephone or email enquiries@sharpepritchard.co.uk
Click here to view our archived articles or search below.
|
OUR RECENT ARTICLES IPA guidance 2025: Managing PFI distress and preparing for expiry
Jul 03, 2025
Aanya Gujral and David Owens dive into the recent guidance published on managing the risks associated with Private Finance Initiative (“PFI”) projects.
Data (Use and Access) Act – Updating Data Protection Law and more
Jul 03, 2025
On the 19th June 2025, the Data Use and Access Bill (“DUA Bill”) received Royal Assent to become the Data Use and Access Act 2025 (“DUA Act”).
Modifying subsidies: What is permitted and what is not?
Jun 24, 2025
Beatrice Wood and Oliver Slater explore recent developments and discuss the process of awarding subsidies.
Getting new PPP right: Smarter tools for smarter infrastructure
Jun 24, 2025
Nicola Sumner, Steve Gummer and Roseanne Serrelli discuss the 'dos and don'ts' of Public-private Partnerships in their new form.
Zones/RABs and heat networks: The path to an investible infrastructure asset class?
Jun 19, 2025
The UK’s new heat network zoning framework (the outlines for which were drawn by the Energy Act 2023) is set to redefine how low‑carbon heating is delivered by creating geographic zones, where district heat networks are the mandated, optimal solution.
Partial debt guarantees- Reviving Investment in UK Water Infrastructure
Jun 17, 2025
Is it Time for a Public Sector Major Infrastructure Debt Guarantor?
Court gives clarity on consultations : R (The National Council for Civil Liberties) and others v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jun 10, 2025
Chloe Woodward and Joe Walker discuss a recent judgment on when engagement with third parties constitute a formal consultation and must therefore adhere to case law on being 'run fairly'.
URS Corporation Limited v BDW Trading Limited [2025] UKSC 21 – Supreme Court hands down significant judgment for the construction industry
May 27, 2025
Helen Arthur explores a recent Supreme Court judgment on building safety in high-rise buildings, explaining what the decision means for defects claims.
Catch me if you can: Local government blazes a trail in increased SME spending
May 21, 2025
Juli Lau and Natasha Barlow take readers through the report published by the BCC on procurement spending.
Changing Course: Navigating Variations Under JCT and NEC Contracts
May 21, 2025
Tiah Weekes explains the process of changes to contracts in the field of construction.
Lessons in public consultation: High Court finds failures in local authority’s consideration of consultation responses
May 21, 2025
George McLellan and Samuel Hart explore the High Court decision ruling that Lambeth Council broke the law in the process of establishing an LTN in the borough.
Allocating risk in amended JCT contracts: Lessons from John Sisk & Son Limited v Capital & Centric (Rose) Limited
May 12, 2025
David Owens and Elizabeth Withers explore recent developments in construction contract case law.
|
ABOUT SHARPE PRITCHARD We are a national firm of public law specialists, serving local authorities, other public sector organisations and registered social landlords, as well as commercial clients and the third sector. Our team advises on a wide range of public law matters, spanning electoral law, procurement, construction, infrastructure, data protection and information law, planning and dispute resolution, to name a few key specialisms. All public sector organisations have a route to instruct us through the various frameworks we are appointed to. To find out more about our services, please click here. |
OUR NEXT EVENT
|
OTHER UPCOMING EVENTS
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |