General Optical Council names three firms to £500k legal services panel

Must read

Families refusing access to support

Is home a suitable option for residence and care for a vulnerable adult if their family refuses access to support? Sophie Holmes analyses a recent ruling.

Families refusing access to support

Unlocking legal talent

Jonathan Bourne of Damar Training sets out why in-house council teams and law firms should embrace apprenticeships.

How hair strand testing should be instructed for family court proceedings

For years, FTS, a drug, alcohol and DNA lab in Yorkshire, has been advocating for an end to the use of Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) cut-off levels in the family courts, writes Paul Hackett (Sponsored Editorial)

Webinars

The General Optical Council has named three law firms to a legal services panel worth an estimated £500,000.

Details: 24.Jul.2019

Topics in this article:

The requirements of the service are:

Conduct of investigative work on the GOC’s behalf in relation to fitness to practise allegations;
Preparation for, and presentation of, the GOC’s case at substantive Fitness to Practise Committee hearings;
Occasional preparation for, and presentation of the GOC’s case at non-substantive hearings (interim order applications/reviews/extensions, substantive order reviews) and registration appeal committee hearings;
Provision of advice relating to the conduct of individual investigations into the fitness to practise of GOC registrants and also relating to interpretation of GOC legislation/Rules;
Provision of training to council members, committee members, case examiners and staff.

The successful firms were:

Kingsley Napley.
Capsticks.
CMS.

The contract was awarded on the basis of case management (weighting: 20), credibility and track record (weighting: 20), quality and range of legal services (weighting: 10), understanding of GOC needs (weighting: 10) and cost (weighting: 40).